Extra Time Problems Hero

Extra Time Problems

A Tale of Diminishing Returns

Football at Breaking Point

For much of football’s history, drawn matches were resolved through replays, often requiring teams to meet multiple times. Extra time was introduced in the early twentieth century as an alternative intended to determine a winner without the logistical difficulties of replaying entire matches. However, in contemporary football it has become the most damaging period in the sport.

Extending play adds severe fatigue and elevates injury risk at precisely the point when players are least capable of sustaining it. Yet it rarely produces goals or decisive action. Instead, risk-averse managers frequently opt to “park the bus” and play for penalties.

Attempts to rescue extra time, such as FIFA’s Golden Goal experiment of the 1990s and early 2000s, were explicitly intended both to encourage attacking football and to reduce the number of matches decided by penalties.1 In practice, they failed to achieve either. Instead of inspiring attacking play, the fear of instant defeat reinforced caution and left penalties as the most common outcome.

Extra time places an untenable load on players, magnifying fatigue and injury risk within an already congested match calendar.

Fatigue and Injury Risk

Modern football already pushes players to their physical limits. For much of the game’s history, drawn matches were replayed, and extra time was introduced as a practical alternative, but in today’s era of relentless scheduling it has become the most dangerous period in the sport. Scientific studies confirm what players and coaches already know: extra time exposes athletes to the highest levels of fatigue and injury risk. By the 120th minute, sprinting output falls by nearly 20%, muscle glycogen is depleted in three quarters of fibres, and neuromuscular drive declines sharply.2 These conditions create ideal circumstances for hamstring and groin injuries.

Practitioner surveys reinforce this picture: 90% of elite coaches and medical staff believe extra time raises injury risk, and almost as many adjust recovery protocols after matches that include it.3,4

UEFA’s Elite Club Injury Study consistently shows the highest injury rates late in matches, with the last 15 minutes of regulation time already carrying more than double the baseline risk. Extending play another 30 minutes pushes injury likelihood to 2.5 to 3 times higher, while injury burden, measured by severity and days lost, is greater in knockout matches that include extra time.5 In short, the longer the match extends, the greater the physiological cost and the smaller the chance of meaningful footballing action.

The physiological data are reinforced by visible examples. Modern players operate at unprecedented intensity, with repeated sprints, pressing, and transitions over 90 minutes already depleting energy systems to their limits. The evolution of player workloads illustrates this transformation clearly. At 17, Lionel Messi had made just 9 first-team appearances for Barcelona.6 In stark contrast, by the same age, Lamine Yamal had already featured in 100 appearances for the same club.7 The generational leap in match exposure underscores how modern scheduling and competition structures have dramatically accelerated physical and developmental demands on players. Extending that strain by another 30 minutes not only undermines performance quality but heightens the likelihood of soft-tissue and overuse injuries.

Meanwhile, workloads continue to escalate. In 2024–25, Real Madrid’s Federico Valverde played more than 6,500 minutes across 77 matches, including La Liga, the Champions League and the Copa América with Uruguay.8 Covering distances that exceed 12km per game, he exemplifies how modern players are pushed to physical extremes across overlapping club and international calendars.9

Manchester City’s Rodri voiced his concerns after playing close to 70 matches in a single season for club and country, admitting he felt “mentally and physically drained.” He has repeatedly warned that the schedule is “unsustainable” and has even suggested that players may strike if nothing changes.10 As Pep Guardiola says, “More than 50 games is too much for the players in the season. It’s too much for the human being, for the body cannot sustain.” 11 His comments reflect a growing consensus among players and managers that the football calendar has reached breaking point.

This concern is now echoed by many of the game’s leading figures. Kylian Mbappé stated in 2025 that “it is not only a matter of the number of games, but more about recovery. We just need a bit more rest, time off for our bodies to regenerate and recover from the number of matches we have to play.” He added that he had “never seen a player, even the greatest of all time, play 60 matches in a season and always be at their best.” He added: “It is a matter which needs to be looked into, because everyone will come out as a winner. People will see games of a higher quality.” 12

Broader studies confirm this picture of overload. Elite clubs now play between 60 and 80 matches annually, with the traditional off-season all but erased, and only about 13 percent of players receiving the recommended 28-day recovery break.13 Other analyses estimate that “elite players spend upwards of 80 percent of the year on football-related commitments, leaving limited time for recovery and private life.” 14 In such an environment, an extra 30 minutes of play is not trivial. It increases cumulative load, extends physical stress, and erodes the recovery window essential for regeneration and sustained performance.

The recognition of these dangers has finally reached football’s highest levels. In 2024, FIFA appointed Arsène Wenger to head a new player welfare task force after mounting pressure from FIFPRO, while UEFA gave players direct representation on its Executive Committee.15 Even national coaches have begun questioning the merits of the additional 30 minutes, with Spain’s Luis de la Fuente comtemplating during Euro 2024, “In a demanding tournament like the Euro, perhaps extra time could be abolished.” 16 By September 2025, UEFA and FIFPRO jointly warned that “the calendar has reached a tipping point” and urged coordinated reform.17 Concurrently, YouGov reported that UEFA was seriously considering scrapping extra time from knockout matches entirely, moving directly to penalties after 90 minutes as a way to reduce player load.18

Taken together, the evidence is overwhelming: extra time does not merely add fatigue, it multiplies injury risk and diminishes performance at the exact stage when tournaments should be showcasing players at their best. In an era where calendars are already saturated and recovery windows compressed, persisting with extra time is both medically and competitively indefensible. Rising heat and climate stress further compound these physical dangers, adding an environmental dimension to the fatigue and injury crisis now facing modern football.

Heat and Climate Change

Football, unlike many other sports, cannot easily retreat indoors or into climate-controlled environments. Matches are played outdoors on large, open fields, often in direct sunlight, and players are required to exert themselves continuously for 90 minutes or more. As global temperatures rise, this exposure has become a major player-welfare issue. From community pitches to elite tournaments like the 2026 FIFA World Cup, climate change is reshaping the conditions under which football is played and raising questions about how long the sport can ignore the physical dangers of extreme heat.

The 2026 World Cup has become a flashpoint in this debate. A Guardian investigation found that “footballers will be at very high risk of experiencing extreme heat stress” at ten of the sixteen venues.19 Matches scheduled in the southern United States and Mexico are expected to reach dangerous heat levels, especially for afternoon kick-offs. The scientists found the greatest stress would strike between 2pm and 5pm at all but one of the stadiums. In Arlington and Houston, temperatures would rise above 50°C during the mid to late afternoon and place a “heavy burden on the body” that could lead to heat exhaustion and even heatstroke.

The 2025 Club World Cup served as a warning. Matches were played in temperatures exceeding 38°C, with players reporting dizziness and exhaustion during afternoon kick-offs. FIFPRO’s medical director Vincent Gouttebarge warned that when core temperature surpasses 40°C, “you have a lack of muscle control. In the worst case, you can lose consciousness.” 20 FIFPRO’s director of policy and strategic relations Alexander Bielefeld called the tournament “a wake-up call in the context of a warming planet.” FIFPRO and UEFA have jointly called for stronger scientific standards to determine when matches should be suspended due to heat risk.

Unlike other major sports, football has no realistic indoor alternative. Stadium capacity requirements, natural-grass standards and crowd logistics make climate-controlled venues nearly impossible, meaning adaptation rather than avoidance must be the strategy. Governing bodies have introduced measures such as hydration breaks, adjusted kick-off times and improved pitch-side medical support, but sustained exposure to high temperatures continues to impair recovery, increase inflammation and exacerbate fatigue across congested calendars. For a sport already struggling with workload and injury management, rising global heat adds a new dimension of risk that scheduling reforms alone cannot solve.

This growing environmental strain amplifies every existing concern about player workloads and recovery times, and makes extra time simply unsustainable in the modern game. When heat, fatigue and fixture congestion collide, football’s oldest tiebreaker is exposed as an ancient relic from a bygone era.

Extra Time Inefficiency: Across both the World Cup and the UEFA Champions League, roughly two-thirds of matches that reach extra time still go to penalties. The 30 minutes functions as an exhausting and damaging delay before the inevitable shootout.

No Goals and Low Drama

Extra time produces far fewer goals than regulation time and rarely changes the outcome of a match. In recent FIFA World Cups regulation time has averaged about 2.7 goals per game, but the scoring rate drops sharply once matches go beyond 90 minutes.

Of the last 56 FIFA World Cup matches that have gone to extra time, only 18 produced a winner during the additional 30 minutes. The remaining 38 matches were still settled by penalties. Legendary exceptions, such as the 1970 World Cup semi-final between Italy and West Germany that produced five extra time goals, stand out precisely because they are so unusual.

Club football tells a similar story. Since penalty shootouts were introduced in the 1970–71 season, roughly two-thirds of UEFA Champions League matches that go to extra time still end up being decided by penalties.

The situation in finals is even worse. There have been 14 Champions League finals that have gone to extra time since the first shootout final in 1984, and together they have produced just 4 goals in 420 minutes of play. Three came in a single match, Real Madrid’s 2014 victory over Atlético. Incredibly, the other 13 extra time periods combined produced just a solitary goal!

The scarcity of goals and decisive moments means extra time offers little in the way of drama. More often it feels like a holding pattern that disrupts the flow of the match and diminishes the spectacle.

The 2024 Copa América quarter-final between Uruguay and Brazil provides a modern example. Reduced to 10 men in the 74th minute, Marcelo Bielsa’s Uruguay sat deep, wasted time, and played for penalties. As Bielsa admitted afterwards: “When we were one man down, we decided to dedicate ourselves to defend in our half.” 16

Managers often approach extra time with caution, not only because their players are fatigued, but also to preserve energy for remaining knockout matches if they do indeed progress. Rather than chasing goals, teams slow the tempo and avoid risks, allowing games to drift toward penalties. Fixture overload amplifies this conservative mindset. As Jürgen Klopp has repeatedly warned, “The players are overworked. Easy as that.” 21

When extra time collapses under fatigue and caution, fate is left in the hands of the penalty shootout. Penalties strip the game of rhythm and movement, reducing it to static and clinical kicks that can define or damage careers and leave players exposed to consequences far beyond the pitch.

  1. Cox, Andrew, The Rise and Fall of the Golden Goal: How It Defined Tournaments and Created Legends. These Football Times, 5 December 2019[↩]
  2. Bangsbo, J., Mohr, M., & Krustrup, P., Physical and metabolic demands of training and match-play in the elite football player. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(7), 665–674., 2006[↩]
  3. Harper, David J., et al, Practitioners’ Perceptions of the Soccer Extra-Time Period: Implications for Future Research. PLOS ONE, vol. 11, no. 7, 2016, e0157687., 2016[↩]
  4. Nédélec, Mathieu, et al, Recovery in Soccer: Part II—Recovery Strategies. Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 9–22., 16 November 2012[↩]
  5. Ekstrand, Jan, et al, Lessons Learned from Two Decades of Injury Surveillance in Elite Football. Aspetar Sports Medicine Journal, vol. 8, 27 March 2019[↩]
  6. “Stats by Age.” Messi vs Ronaldo. Messi vs Ronaldo App.[↩]
  7. Lamine Yamal Reaches 100 Appearances for FC Barcelona. FC Barcelona, 30 April 2025[↩]
  8. Transfermarkt, Federico Valverde — Performance Data 2024–25. Transfermarkt, 3 November 2025[↩]
  9. Di Salvo, V., et al, Performance characteristics according to playing position in elite soccer. International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 222–227., 2007[↩]
  10. Baxter, Kevin, Rodri Reveals Players Are Close to a Strike over Increase in Matches. Sports Illustrated, 3 October 2024[↩]
  11. Jackson, Jamie, Guardiola warns Manchester City’s injury-prone players could be sold. The Guardian, 22 February 2025[↩]
  12. France Star Mbappé Calls for Players to Get More Time Off. RFI, 4 September 2025[↩]
  13. The Always-On Game: Football Calendar Burnout. The Football Week, 18 July 2025[↩]
  14. The Price of Non-Stop Play: How Football’s Schedule Risks Players and Clubs. Football Benchmark, 5 December 2024[↩]
  15. Williams, Callum, FIFA Brings Arsène Wenger on Board to Lead New Player Welfare Initiative. Insider Sport, 31 October 2024[↩]
  16. Baldi, Ryan, Copa América scrapped extra-time. Should other knockout tournaments? The Guardian, 12 July 2024[↩][↩]
  17. UEFA and FIFPRO Urge Action on Player Welfare. Reuters, 16 September 2025[↩]
  18. Christien Pheby, UEFA Considers Scrapping Extra Time from Knockout Games. YouGov, 19 February 2025[↩]
  19. Ajit Niranjan, Footballers at ‘Very High Risk of Extreme Heat Stress’ During World Cup 2026. The Guardian, 29 November 2024[↩]
  20. George Timms, Extreme Heat Is Testing FIFA’s Ability To Protect 2026 World Cup Athletes. Time, 19 July 2025[↩]
  21. Klopp, Jürgen, Every word of Jurgen Klopp’s brilliant dig at TNT Sports and fixture congestion. This Is Anfield, 1 May 2024[↩]